Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to an all new Reaction & Review. Tonight, guys, I'm gonna be checking out a horror comedy from 1986. That movie is "Monster In the Closet".
Now, I know two things about this movie. The first thing I know about it is that it was put out by Troma. And for the most part, they've had a really good track record for this series. And I've noticed that, last year, it was the 50th anniversary of Troma Studios. Which is an amazing achievement, and I have been possibly considering doing a marathon of sorts dedicated to Troma. Now I don't know if it will be a standard marathon or not, but it has been something that I have been thinking about doing later this year, hopefully. I'll let you guys know later when I come up with something.
But anyway, let's get into tonight's movie. Now the other thing I know about this particular film has to do with a couple members of the cast, who are making their debut in this movie. The first actress goes by the name of Stacy Ferguson. Some of you will probably know her better as 'Fergie' AKA a former member of the Black Eyed Peas. This one, admittedly, I'm not totally sure of, considering that I've never seen her in anything, outside of her musical performances with the Black Eyed Peas. But then again, I am watching her debut in a film. I don't know if she's just playing an extra or is somehow playing a bigger part of the movie. But I will find out soon enough.
Now the other cast member is someone most people will recognize by name. That actor goes by the name of Paul Walker. Most people recognize him from the "Fast & Furious" movies, and who also tragically passed away in 2013. Now, personally speaking, I know nothing about the guy, nor have I ever seen anything that he was in before his passing. And yes, I am also including the "Fast & Furious" movies because I have zero interest in ever watching those movies. However, I'm not gonna muddy things up further by talking about that series. Point is, like I said, I've never seen anything beforehand with Mr. Walker, and since he's also making his film debut here, this will give me a chance to see what he could pull off in his early years.
So now, with all that said, I'm really curious to see what this movie is all about. I'm hoping for it to be good, or at least interesting, but this could also possibly be another stinker by Troma, since they are not prone to making terrible movies. If you want a couple of examples, go read my reviews of "Vegas In Space" and "Graduation Day". But before that, you should at least give this review a read first before you do so. And on that note, I may as well just shut up and push play, and I'm gonna do that right now. So, without further ado, it's time to kick back, relax, and check out "Monster In The Closet".
6 minutes later
OK, so I have a question, now that the opening credits are playing, that I wanted to ask. So far, our last 3 victims have been, well...I guess "eaten" by the monster that's in peoples closets. I'm using the term "eaten" rather loosely since all we see are clothes flying out of the closet and nothing else. But that's not really what's on my mind. What I'm curious about is how does this monster travel about to different closets? Does it have, like, some magical door that lets him go to peoples closets? Or is it something like "Monsters Inc." where there's a monster world that our monster can just go to and fro from doors whenever? I realize it's sorta the same the question I'm asking here, but I'm still really curious about this, you know what I mean?
10 minutes later
All right, I know this probably doesn't happen very often, if ever, but it's rare for me to find some guy opening the shower curtain to see his wife showering and just having a quick, normal conversation without getting slapped in the face. Seems kinda weird to me, but then again, perhaps maybe this happens often between the two like this, so who am I to judge?
12 minutes later
So, guys, I'm now getting my first look at this monster here...and it looks pretty cool. Admittedly, I'm kinda surprised we get to see it *this* early, but I guess sooner is better than later, am I right?
1 minute later
Oh, and...apparently, it also has a second mouth inside it's mouth. So...the monster is essentially a goofy-looking version of a Xenomorph. That's good to know, I suppose.
20 minutes later
OK, I know this is probably pointless to bring up, but I just want to make it known that the monster is dragging the professor away to the closet, all the while Richard is clinging onto him to let the monster go. And as all this is happening, the rest of the people, including members of the U.S. army or whatever, are *not* shooting at the fucking monster! And again, I understand this is pointless to bring up seeing as how bullets don't affect this creature whatsoever. And if that's the case, then I'm wondering how you can even damage this monster to begin with? I'm really sorta curious here.
13 minutes later
Wait, so the answer as to how they should destroy the monster is to destroy it's "energy"? What the fuck does that even mean!? Do they mean, like, drain all of it's willpower or something? Or do you mean destroy it's energy source? I really want to know now on what the hell they mean by destroying the monster's energy. I'm really curious about this.
The Review
Well, guys, that was "Monster In The Closet". Let me go ahead and shut the film off here...OK. So...where exactly do I begin with this one...? Well...it's gonna be a little bit harder for me to criticize this one. And I'll get to why later, but I should let you guys know right now that my first impressions of this movie are...kinda average. And that's the best way I can summarize this movie, it's just...OK. It's certainly not the worst Troma flick I've seen, but it's definitely not one of their best either. It's just a somewhat average movie at best.
So, why don't we start things off, as I normally do with a lot of these reviews, with the film's writing. And the first thing that I need to do here is to address a question that I had while I was watching the movie. What exactly does Diane mean when her son discovers the monster's weak source, in which they must destroy it's energy? Well, the answer is kinda stupid, really. So, the answer as to how to destroy the monster's energy is to destroy all closets around the world so that it can't rejuvenate itself, therefore it will die very slowly. And no, I'm not kidding about any of that. That is literally the answer this movie gives out. So you see everyone from all countries in the world destroying their closets so that the monster can't reappear in there, nor will it find a place to hide in to return to. And also, even though the movie doesn't say it outright, I can assume that the monster doesn't have an actual home, outside of going into closets where it can eat people if they go into them. So, if you were expecting some kind of deeper lore from where the monster came from, you're not gonna find that here.
Now since I got my answer on how this monster is suppose to be killed, that does raise a couple of plotholes. First off, even assuming for a moment that this whole idea that the monsters energy does come from destroying all closets around the world, before that all happened, the movie gives out montages of the monster walking towards San Francisco from Chestnut Hills, California, while carrying Richard throughout the whole thing. And before this stupid idea was revealed, it didn't look like the monster was affected at all from walking all the way to San Francisco, which was roughly about 40 miles from where it walked from Chestnut Hills. Which also raises a question on how long exactly did it take for Diane to make this announcement public on television to tell people to destroy all closets, while the monster was out on it's long walk? It's logic that like which could make you question this movie's plotholes.
But it's here where I have to address something, in which it's gonna make those problems seem trivial here. You see, this movie was clearly not meant to be taken too seriously. In which, I mean that it wasn't trying to be this complex, serious monster movie where it's trying to make you think. That's not what this movie was trying to go for. This movie's real goal is to be a spoof of 50's B movie monster and horror films of the like. And on that front, it does a really good job of that. As the presentation of the film is trying to be a homage to all of those films from decades past. And that's the movie's biggest strength, in which it knows what it wants to be. And for those who may not have any knowledge of those particular movies from that time period, there's a chance that you're probably gonna hate this thing, especially if you didn't know it was trying to spoof off those films from way back when.
I should also mention the movie's humor real quick. Since I mentioned at the start of this that this movie was advertised as a horror comedy, I was curious to see how much this movie was gonna aim for the comedy. And aside from the spoofing of 50's monster movies, the comedy, at least for me, didn't get a whole lot of laughs out of. Mind you now, that's not to say that the movie isn't funny. There a couple of moments here where I did get a chuckle out of this movie, but aside from that, the comedy here didn't exactly land with me. Now, of course, I totally understand that humor is completely subjective, so someone could find this movie more funnier than I did. But being that this is a Troma film, I was honestly expecting more from it's humor, but unfortunately, it didn't entirely stick the landing here.
There's really not much I can say about the characters. You have, Richard, who's essentially just Clark Kent. And no, I'm not joking about that either. He's literally a reporter at a news agency who ends up trying to get the story on the mysterious closet murders going on at Chestnut Hills. And he also wears glasses and has black hair, much like Clark Kent does. And also, for some reason, whenever his glasses are off, Diane has these mesmerized, googly eyes and just stares at him like an idiot until he puts his glasses back on. That apparently is, somehow, a plot point in which I won't try to spoil here. But yeah, other than that, there's not much to say about the characters here. Most of them are pretty forgetful, even for a movie that was suppose to be an homage to 50's monster movies. But then again, considering what I just said, character depth is another thing that this movie really doesn't try to aim for either.
So overall, guys, the writing in this movie, for all its intents and purposes, gets the job done as it being a spoof of old monster movies from the past. And as long as you go into it with that mind set, then you're most likely gonna have a blast with this movie. In fact, it'll probably make the movie a whole lot funnier that way, too. But, if you're someone who's looking for a more, how I should say..."serious" monster movie, then this is not the film for you. That said, the writing is still fine for what it is, even if it's not exactly one of Troma's funnier movies. What is surprisingly solid, though, is the acting. The acting from everybody is actually pretty good for the most part. Everybody seemed like they were having a blast while making this movie. And that's really cool to see. I'm even going to include the two debuting actors I mentioned earlier, both Fergie and Paul Walker. Fergie, I'm going to assume, was the little girl at the beginning of the movie, who's only in it for about a minute or two before she gets eaten by the closet monster. While with Paul Walker, he certainly turned in a decent showing, given the material he had to work with as a child actor at the time. It's not exactly perfect, but I wasn't exactly expecting perfection from a first-time child actor either. But anyway, like I said, the acting here is pretty good from most of the entire cast here.
Special effects in this movie are great. And on the terms of it being low budget, as is the case with a lot of Troma films, the effects here definitely hold up. The one thing that's gonna be noticeable right off the bat is the closet monster. The costuming on this monster looks amazing! It seriously does. Now, I kinda have to make a correction on myself. See, I completely forgot that they do kinda spoil what the monster looks like, as there is an image of it on the back of the DVD case. So, this is kinda my second time seeing this monster. Still though, seeing it in motion looks great. There are other bits of early CG electricity and pyrotechnics here as well, but the monster is what definitely steals the show here. Which, it should, seeing as how it's a part of the title of the movie and all.
Before I move onto camerawork, I need to talk about editing for a moment. Or should I say, lack thereof. Now, I'm not saying that any of the content that is provided in this movie needed to be cut out or anything, but there are several odd moments where a scene will transition to black, and it will stay like that for a good amount of time. Now, I didn't catch how long it was the first time that they did this, but the second time around I caught it. It was about 14 second long after they cut to black and then before it transitions to the next scene. And the third, and final, time was about 12 seconds long. I don't know *what* the hell was going when they did this and I have no idea as to *why* they're even in here. My guess is that this might've been a fuck-up on the editor's point, because these kinds of pauses should *not* exist, especially when they were being transferred over to DVD. Now I could maybe forgive this if this thing were originally a made-for-TV film, but being that this was made by Troma, that's not the case. And I kinda expected somebody to fix this kind of shit before they put the movie out on DVD. But unfortunately, it does exist, so get use to seeing about a grand total of around 30-35 seconds of blackness whenever those transitions happen.
Now, despite all that, the camerawork here is pretty good. The lighting is lit rather well. The score here is OK. The sound-mixing, however, is a little bit on the shit side. Now, it's not completely un-listenable, but it feels like the sound quality in general could've been better. I had the volume up on my TV at max, because anything lower than that, and the movie's very quiet. And also, some of the sound-mixing isn't exactly up to par either, as there are a couple of scenes towards the latter half where the sound-mixing could've been better. Now again, I'm going to assume that this was the result of a somewhat poor transfer to DVD. As with the editing issues, and the sound-mixing being more of an issue here than anything else, it kinda makes this DVD look a little bit amateurish and poor. Again, it's not completely awful or anything, as it is still very much listenable, but it's not exactly great either. So, just to warn anyone ahead of time who might be interested in watching this movie, the sound-mixing is a little bit on the poor side here.
And with that said, when it comes down to it, can I recommend "Monster In The Closet"? Kinda sort of, yes. Again, as long as you go into the movie, knowing that it's a homage to 50's B movie monster films and not a serious film, then you're good to go here. If you're looking for something that's campy and fun, then this is certainly worth watching, if at least just once. Granted, it's not really something that I plan on watching a second time, but it's not completely worth by-passing over either, unless if you're not into B movies. Ultimately, guys, the film is just OK. It's worth watching once, if you have a certain curiosity in mind. But for me, personally, it's not worth rewatching again. So I unfortunately won't be adding it to my other collection of ever-growing Troma movies I already have on DVD. And speaking of which, I'm probably gonna go and watch one of them right now. I'll probably start with something like "The Toxic Avenger" and see where it goes from there.
Anyway, guys, with that, we come to the close of another Reaction & Review. Until next time, ladies and gentlemen, take care, and I will see you all later. Peace.