Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to an all new Reaction & Review. Tonight, guys, I'm gonna be covering a spy film from 1998. That movie is "The Avengers".
And in case you clicked on this review thinking that I was gonna review Marvel's "The Avengers", I'm gonna tell you right now that it's not going to happen. The main reason being that I've already seen that movie, so it's ineligible for review. I will say that I did enjoy it. Not as much as a few other Marvel films I've covered and seen on my own time, but it is still an enjoyable film on it's own standards.
Now let's get on back topic for tonight's movie. And in case you're wondering about this version of "The Avengers", it actually started back as a British TV series that ran all the way through the 1960's. And in 1998, Warner Bros. decided to do a film adaptation for this movie, which is what I'm gonna be reviewing tonight. Now, I know this film stars Ralph Fiennes and Uma Thurman, along with Sean Connery. I don't know anything about the nature of their characters, but I hope to find out when I start watching this movie.
Now I'm also aware that this film didn't really do all that well in theaters, and also, people kinda hated this movie, whether they were fans of the show or not. Which would normally spell doom for this movie, however, I also am someone who ended up enjoying movies such as "Super Mario Bros." from 1993, and the "Street Fighter" film with Jean-Claude Van Damme, and neither of those movies were exactly loyal to their source material.
Now admittedly, since I have never seen the TV series this movie is supposed to be based on, I have no idea if this thing is gonna be loyal to it's TV counterpart at all. But whether it's loyal or not doesn't really matter to me here. Because as I've done with countless other adaptations of films based on novels, video games, etc., I really only care if the film is entertaining. And if it is, then this film has already accomplished that feat. However, I won't know for sure it is actually entertaining, or good at all, unless I shut up and I push play, and I'm gonna do that right now. So, without further ado, it's time to kick back, relax, and check out "The Avengers".
17 minutes later
Well, guys, so far, I really don't have a whole lot to say right now because this movie hasn't given me much to work with. I will say, however, that Steed's car looks really cool. I would love to have a model version of that for myself that I can put on display. Other than that, though, this movie's off to a little bit of a slow start. I'm hoping it'll pick up it's pacing soon.
10 minutes later
O...K, I'm gonna ask the obvious here. Why is everyone in this room, including Sean Connery, wearing a bear costume? I guess the reasoning is that they don't want each other to know their secret identities, but still, why the fuck are they all bears? Is there, like, a birthday party or something that they all have to attend to at some point, or is there a bear convention that I'm not aware of? I have so many questions about this scene, guys, and I have a strong feeling that this movie's not going to address any of that.
17 minutes later
All right, guys, I'm just gonna say this right now. I'm hoping that the TV series from the 60's was nowhere near as dull as this movie is. But then again, considering it ran for the entirety of the 60's, it has to at least be partially more interesting than what's shown in this movie. Because this movie is starting to become incredibly dull. I'm hoping maybe the next half of the film will actually be more interesting. But as of this moment, I'm not having much faith in that.
12 minutes later
All right, I have a rather dumb question to ask here. Is there any reason why Colonel Jones is invisible? I mean, okay, sure, the effects involving him are really cool, but I still would like to know how exactly he ended up being invisible. I would like to know this, however, considering we almost have a half an hour left to go, I have a strong feeling that I'm not gonna get an answer to that.
The Review
Well, guys, that was "The Avengers". Let me shut the movie off here...good god. Well, I think it's easy to say that, for me, this movie really kinda sucked. Mind you, it's not truly horrible or anything. But my god, this movie is just so dull, even on the standards of it being a spy film. Which I didn't think was actually possible, but this movie found a way to be as boring as hell.
Let's just start off with the writing here. And as I said earlier, I have never seen the 60's TV show that this movie is supposed to be based on. So I can't really judge this thing on how loyal it is to it's source material. But then again, as I also stated, I don't really care about loyalty to the source material as long as the film is both entertaining and how much it can stand on it's own standards. And unfortunately, this movie doesn't really excel at either one here. This movie isn't very entertaining, and on it's own standards, it's more or less just a knockoff of the 007 series. And not really a good one at that either. Also, even though I haven't seen any of the series from the 60's, I can wager a guess here and say that it holds far better than this movie, which is funny, considering how that series lasted nearly a decade, while this movie underperformed at the box office and didn't get any sequels afterwards. Funny how that works sometimes.
Our story here really doesn't make too much sense, at least until the very end, you learn from our villain, August, that he has developed some kind of weather machine that can basically control the world's weather and that he will control the world now that he has decided to play God with this device, and it's up to our to spy heroes, John Steed and Emma Peel, to stop him and save the world. And I have to ask because, and this is just something that I noticed, why is this the third or fourth movie that I've watched that has some crazed villain controlling the weather? I've seen this done with Mr. Freeze in "Batman & Robin" and I also saw it in that "Recess" movie where the villain in that one wanted to get rid of summer vacation in the most retarded ways possible. And in this one, August is going to control the weather and unless the governments of the world don't surrender to him, he will obliterate their entire continent. So yeah, again, he's basically just trying to play God in this movie, but I still have to ask, what was with writers obsessions in having villains controlling the weather? I'm really sorta curious about that, because it almost seems like a common occurrence to me for some reason.
Now that part isn't really a negative, per se, it's just more so something that I noticed is all. But what *is* a negative here is our characters. The characters in this movie are just boring as shit. Now I can sorta give August a past here since he's basically just a stereotypical mad scientist villain, and he's also played by Sean Connery, however, I'll talk about him later when I cover acting. But as for our two main agents, these are probably some of the most boring agents to appear on screen. We have John Steed who, I swear to god, has to talk in sarcasm most of the time because he really doesn't have any sort of character to him beyond that. I'd say he's almost a discount dollar store version of James Bond, however, that would be a horrible insult to Bond because Bond actually has something resembling a character. Well, depending on the movies, anyways. I haven't read any of the novels from Ian Flemming and less said about the Daniel Craig movies, the better.
So yeah, Steed doesn't really have a character to him, and the same can also be said for Uma Thurman's character Emma Peel. She really has nothing going for her. You find out in the beginning of the movie that she has a doppelganger twin who's working for August. And also, when you do see the two on screen together for the first time, they have different eye colors. Emma has blue eyes, and her twin has brown eyes. I don't know why that is. I guess maybe they wanted to differentiate the two characters in some way. However, there's not really much of a difference beyond that, outside of having different costumes, because neither of them have any sort of character to them. And I don't really recall a point where Emma's twin is a robot or just some kind of super clone that August made on his spare time because he has an obsession with her. I don't know why, maybe he just saw something in her that I didn't. Other than that, though, there's nothing else to either Emma or her twin.
As for other characters, well...what about them? There's nothing there in terms of characters that you're going to care about because they're either not in it for very long, or they're just there as part of August's line of villains. If we're talking about any other protagonists, well, there's Steed's mother, who tries to help get Emma back after she got captured by August. But you don't see much of her again after she gets knocked in the back of the head and Emma gets herself free. And then there's also Colonel James, who's completely invisible. Why is he invisible? I don't fucking know. Maybe Sue Storm had a relative at some point that I didn't know about, which would make more sense than him not having any sort of establishing character at all. And it also doesn't help the fact that he's only in it for about two scenes, and all of it happens in the last half hour of the movie. Which is a shame because I would've loved to known more about him.
In fact, that would be more interesting than what he actually got for this movie because the writing here is boring as shit. It doesn't really make much sense, even when you learn about August's evil plan. OK sure, he has the whole controlling the weather gimmick, but even before that, everything else is either just filler or just doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. And I may as well just add one more thing to the pile in terms of overall pacing. It's pretty bad. It takes a while for it to get going, and while it's not as awful as some other movies I've seen for this series that had awful pacing, it's still pretty bad despite it being a little over 90 minutes long. So, pacing here is a little bit of an issue. And the writing is, again, dull as hell, and doesn't really have very much going for it.
Now as for the acting, well, I will say that at least the acting here is halfway decent. Special mention will have to go to Sean Connery, because the man was known to be one of the gods of hammy acting for his time. And while this is certainly nowhere near one of his best roles, he still did pretty decently for what was given to him. Then again, this was pretty late into his career, so maybe by this point he just didn't really care as much and just wanted the paycheck that badly. Which, I can't really blame him for, if that's really the case. The acting from the other cast members is okay, except for our main two cast members, who seemed to have just phoned it in. Like I said earlier, John Steed's entire character is just him talking as if he's sarcastic, and that's all he talks in, which is probably the reason why Ralph Fiennes phoned it in as he did here. And as for Uma Thurman, she's pretty much in the same boat as well, Not only is her British accent questionable at best, but also, she and Ralph Fiennes have no chemistry together at all. Neither of them seemed like they wanted to be there and the only reason why they were there is because they needed that paycheck so badly. Which, much like with Sean Connery, I can't necessarily blame them because they could only do so much with a bad script that was given to them. And outside of Sean Connery, no one else here actually tried. So yeah, that's acting for you in a nutshell.
Special effects are actually okay here. For the standards of late 90's CG, this stuff is actually halfway decent. Most of the stuff you'll see involves all the weather towards the latter half of the movie, while other times, you see it being utilized during the chase scene involving our main agents and these killer robot bugs. Some of them are CG, but there a few that were practically made, which is really cool to see. The stunt-work here is also pretty decent. I mean, it's nothing ultimately special, but at least it's halfway decent, which is more than what I could say about the writing, but I'm not gonna harp on that anymore than I already did. Costuming here is also decent, even though the idea of that one scene where some of the cast members, including Connery, were all wearing bear costumes. And I should stress that they were giant teddy bears as well. At the very least, I can say there all a different color. So, I guess that's something.
Camerawork here is pretty good. Lighting here is lit fine. The sound-mixing here is good. And the music is just there, really. There's nothing ultimately nothing special about it, so I'll just mark it off as it existing, and that's pretty much it.
So ultimately, guys, when it comes down to it, can I recommend "The Avengers"? Um, no. I seriously can't recommend this movie because, one, it's boring as hell, two, there are other better spy films you could watch, such as a majority of the James Bond movies, and three, regardless of whether or not this movie was in any way loyal to the source material, it's still a bad movie overall. And not an enjoyable bad movie that you could watch with friends on a bad movie night. No, this one is just bad on a really boring level. If you were one of those people who were a fan of 60's series, then you can just skip this movie altogether as it provides nothing of value to that series. And of course, this has no value for me, personally speaking, so I will happily trade it in the moment that I get that chance. In the meantime, however, I'm gonna go and watch one of my many James Bond movies I have on DVD. I think I'll just go and watch something such as "For Your Eyes Only". Why not? I haven't seen that one in a long time, so I'll go and do that next as soon as I get done typing this review up.
And with that, guys, we come to the close of another Reaction & Review. Until next time, ladies and gentlemen, take care, and I will see you all later. Peace.