Reaction & Review | Phantasm: Ravager

 

Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to an all new Reaction & Review. Tonight, guys, we're finally finishing the "Phantasm" series, as I'm taking a look at the fifth and final entry that came out in 2016. That movie is "Phantasm: Ravager".

I'm gonna be perfectly honest with you, guys, I'm kinda happy that this is the last "Phantasm" film that I have to cover here, because these movies have ranged on being ridiculously average. It's not that they're bad movies or anything, it's just that, ever since that first movie, each one has ranged on being consistent with more and more problems that I've come across throughout my journey on covering these movies. Especially that 4th movie, which is easily the weakest entry of the entire franchise. If you want to know more about my thoughts on that one, well, I covered it a couple of weeks ago, so it should be really easy to find.

But anyway, shameless plugging aside, I actually kinda broke my protocol here and dug up a little bit of information on this movie. I didn't do that for the previous films, because I wanted to go into them as blind as possible. And while I'm still going into this movie blindly, I wanted to actually find out a little bit about what I was getting myself into here. And part of the reason why I wanted to do so was mainly because this thing came out in 2016. 18 years after the ending of the 4th movie, they made another sequel, AKA this one. And I am both curious and concerned about this movie for a variety of different reasons that I'm gonna try to condense here.

For starters, I'm mostly concerned about the fact that this thing is even another sequel at all. As I mentioned in my previous review for "Phantasm IV: Oblivion", when it comes to horror movie sequels, they usually start to decline in quality, as it did for that movie. And what's even more concerning is the fact that you wait almost 2 decades to make *another* sequel. Now yes, I understand that Don Coscarelli, the guy's who written and directed all of the previous "Phantasm" movies, has been wanting to do a fifth sequel to this series and he had to go through a lot of hurdles in order to get this movie made, but it still makes me concerned about the overall quality of this movie. That said, though, I'm am curious as to what you can do with a sequel for a movie series like this with modern technology.

Which brings me to one other thing that I wanted to talk about before I watch the movie. Now, as I've just stated already, Don Coscarelli has been the writer and director for all of the previous "Phantasm" films. And while he is credited as a writer for this fifth entry, he's not directing it this time. The director, this time, goes by a man named David Hartman, who also co-wrote the movie with Coscarelli. And I'd love to tell you more about what I know about this guy, but unfortunately, from what little information that was I able to find on him, there really isn't much to say about him. In fact, most of his directing credit comes from animation. He's directed quite a number of cartoon shows, most of which I've never even heard of, aside from "Jackie Chan Adventures" and "Godzilla: The Series". So, to take someone who's focus is mostly centered around animation to directing a sequel to a horror movie series is a rather strange choice to make. And I don't know if this was done deliberately or not.

Now, I probably shouldn't judge too harshly. I've not even watched the movie yet, and it's possible that maybe a fresh face is what is needed for this film series. Granted, I understand it's the final entry and all, but it could still impress me. So anyway, with that overly long introduction out of the way, it's finally time for me to see if this movie is any good at all. And the only way I'm gonna find out is if I shut up and I push play, and I'm gonna do that right now. So, without further ado, it's time to kick back, relax, and check out "Phantasm: Ravager".

18 minutes later

All right, guys, I know it's still a bit early in the film, but I think now might be the time to mention this. So far, the acting here, mainly from our returning cast members, such as Reggie and Mike, has been really good so far. And then I come across this red-haired woman named Dawn, and her acting is fucking terrible. Just thought I'd let you guys know now, so that way I don't have to mention it again later. At least, until I cover the acting for the overall review, but still. I'm hoping, maybe, that her acting will get better as the film goes along. But right now, I'm not having any hopes of that happening.

7 minutes later

Well, after being missed from the previous movie, the metal sphere is back again, and it apparently killed the worst actress in the entire movie. I guess that does answer my question on whether or not her acting would improve or not, so at least I can toss that point out of the way pretty quickly.

4 minutes later

O...K...well, holy shit, that's actually a first for this series! I've seen these things kill many humans throughout these movies, but this is the first time I've ever seen a metal sphere kill a horse in that fashion. That's actually...really fucked up. And I feel really sorry for that poor horse, too.

20 minutes later

Oh...well, never mind, Dawn is actually still alive...admittedly, while I'm not sure if her acting will improve here or not, I am curious as to how she's actually alive at all. Oh, and apparently, her name is actually Jane now. I'm gonna honest, guys, I'm a little bit lost here, but at least I am interested to see where else this movie's gonna go.

9 minutes later

So, I'm now getting a first look at this new hellish world by the Tall Man. And I gotta say, despite some questionable CG, it does actually look kinda cool! I'll get more into the special effects a little bit later on when I eventually cover this thing, but again, this new world by the Tall Man does look pretty cool, I will say that much.

3 minutes later

And apparently, we also have a new metal sphere as well. Although this one's more red, given that it causes someone's head to explode the moment it makes contact with it. I will say, though, that it still looked really cool, so at least there's that.

The Review

Well, guys, that was "Phantasm: Ravager". Let me go ahead and shut the film off here...OK. Well, before I give out my initial thoughts on this movie, I am gonna start by saying that the way that this movie decided to conclude itself, it gave me the impression that it was setting itself up for another sequel. Which, honestly, I would've been on board with that. Yeah, my overall opinions on these movies have been somewhat mixed, but I still would've like to have seen what they could've done with another movie. Now granted, I don't think it's ever going to happen, and I'll get to why later when I cover acting. But still, I think they could've done something else, had they decided to go forward with another movie. At least, I think so, anyway.

But anyways, let's actually get into the movie itself here. And as usual, I'm gonna start with the writing. Now, I'm gonna start off by talking about something I hinted at, but never really went into full detail on. So, way back when I reviewed the 3rd movie, I mentioned a horrible theory that I had when I was watching that movie, and it was about a certain line Jody mentioned to Reggie, saying that he shouldn't believe everything that he sees. And I wanted to hold off on discussing that theory until after I finished watching all of the movies in this series. Well, now that I have finished watching them, I believe it's now time for me to tell you guys what that horrible theory was. Essentially, my theory was that this entire movie series was just a dream made up in Reggie's mind. And I feared that he was going to end up in some kind of mental hospital all this time while of this was playing in his head. Now the latter part doesn't isn't really the issue, but more so of the whole thing just being a dream. Which, if that were the case, then it would've made this a waste of fucking time. Because, you had 5 movies to play with, and had they decided to end it with "oh, it was all a dream", then I would've been royally pissed, because I really despise it when movies pull this sort of shit. 

Now, believe it or not, they actually kinda do play with that theory, to a degree. Because, in this movie, Reggie is being told that he has dementia from Mike, who apparently looks a little bit different with the glasses and is a little bit of a nerd as well. But anyway, he tells Reggie that he's been treated at this mental hospital for some time, while Reggie believes that none of this is real, and that the Tall Man is manipulating him in some way. And throughout this movie, it plays with Reggie's mind on what's actually real and what isn't. And this honestly is something that you'll either be really interested in, or you're gonna be totally lost here. Because they play up this angle of the movie a lot, and it's to a certain point where it does this a little too much, in which it tries to mess up your mind, much like it's doing with Reggie. Which, in a way, it does work, seeing as how it wants to work in being a psychological horror movie, but again, it could've dialed this back a little bit.

In terms of characters, there's really honestly not a lot to say about the new characters here, because all of them are pretty flat and one dimensional. The only ones that are even worth mentioning at all are Reggie and the Tall Man. Reggie, I've kinda already talked about, but I wanted to bring up the Tall Man as well, because it sorta encapsulates the ongoing saga between Reggie and him, and why he has let Reggie live all this time when he could've killed him at any point. I won't go too deep into spoilers here regarding everything they've said, but I will say that it is really good stuff. And despite all the hell that Reggie has gone through against the Tall Man and his reanimated corpses, he's still pushing on the fight until he saves Mike and Jody. So, character depth wise, Reggie has it the best here. Especially when compared to the 2 previous films in the series where his character sorta regressed, and it was almost to a point where I even mentioned that I didn't think Coscarelli had any idea on what to do with Reggie's character anymore. Well thankfully, I was proven wrong here, as Reggie definitely had the best development here in this final entry.

So, writing wise, it's certainly better than what was in the 4th movie, which I still stand as the weakest entry of the entire franchise. This movie, although certainly nowhere near as interesting as the first 3 movies were, it still has enough here to make you see where it goes and how it ends. Admittedly, I don't consider this a true ending, but again, it'll just reiterate on what I already talked about earlier, so I'll leave it that. Now with that said, let's get into the acting. And before I talk about the main point of the acting, I will get the only bad actor out of the way here, and it's the same actress who plays Dawn in this movie, which also happens to be her first real name too. But anyway, to put it simply, guys, her acting is fucking terrible. And it's mainly because she sounds very one-noted and sounds very flat with her delivery. And that also goes for when she's playing as Jane. There's no real changes in her voice, other than that she sounds like a generic soldier agent, if that makes any sense at all. But yeah, guys, the acting from her is by far the worst of the entire casting here.

That said, though, let's actually talk about the rest of the acting, which is nothing but positives. When it comes to our recurring cast, all of them do a really good job with their given material. Admittedly, Bill Thornbury, who plays Jody, really only has like, a couple of lines here and there, so it wasn't enough for me to give my full thoughts on his acting, but it's still kinda nice to see him here again. A. Michael Baldwin as Mike pulls off a pretty good showing here. Reggie Bannister as, well...Reggie, probably pulls off one of the best performances he has given out since the first movie, which is actually saying something, given that he was given a much better script to work with.

And that, of course, leaves me with the best actor in the entire movie, which is, unsurprisingly, Angus Scrimm as the Tall Man. The very fact that this man, despite almost being in his 90's, can still pull it off is fucking amazing to see! Regardless of how I felt about the writing in these particular movies, he has always held this character together ever since his first appearance in 1979. And the fact that he can still pull it off 37 years later is, again, absolutely astonishing to see. And as much as I would've loved to have seen where he can take the Tall Man character in a potential sequel, that's not going to happen. Why? Well, simply put, this was one of the last films Angus Scrimm had a part in before passing away, which was also the same year that this movie came out in. Now, of course, you could potentially find someone else to play the Tall Man, however, they would never be able to replace the charm and tenacity that Angus Scrimm brought to the character. It's just personal bias, really. But with that said, the rest of the acting, minus the actress playing Dawn, did a great job here. So, kudos to the entire cast here for putting on such good performances here.

So now, let's, unfortunately, get into the special effects. Now I say unfortunately, because this is quite easily the worst part of the entire movie. And why is that? Well because, for the past 4 movies, I have praised the special effects from top to bottom about how great they've always been. And even though the first movie had some cheap-looking goofy effects, there was still a lot of charm and thought put into those effects, which is why I can't be too harsh with how they looked back then. This movie, however, I have to be harsh here, because most of the effects in this movie are fucking horrible. And I'm talking about everything involving CG, green screen effects, the digital effects in the guns looking like shit, explosions, just about everything involving those effects look horrible. Now before I sound contradictory, yes, I did say that I really liked the hellish world that was created by the Tall Man. But after really getting a chance to talk about it, the effects for that world still looked really bad what with everything I just said about it.

The only bright spot in the special effects are the practical effects, which are mainly used around the beginning, with the best highlight being the horse kill. But everything else...no, it's still fucking terrible. And yes, I am aware that this movie was made on a low budget. However, I must also stress that the other "Phantasm" movies were also made on low budgets. And, barring the first movie, the effects in those movies looked great for what they had to work with. This movie, on the other hand, almost felt like a Sy-Fy Channel Original Movie. Which is pretty fucking sad, considering the low quality those movies usually have. So yeah, unfortunately, the special effects here are mostly fucking terrible.

But otherwise, guys, the camerawork here is pretty good. The lighting here is lit perfectly fine. The sound-mix is also fine. And the music here, at least in terms of it's score anyway is pretty much up to par with how the previous 4 movies sounded. So, at least we have that in terms of it's consistency. It's not great, but it's still pretty good.

So, with all that said, guys, am I able to recommend "Phantasm: Ravager"? I'm gonna say yes, as long as if you've followed the previous 4 films in this series and you liked them enough to check out this fifth entry. For myself, personally speaking, it's certainly better than the 4th movie, but it's not quite saying a whole lot, considering how the other films range on being somewhat average for me. Still though, I can recommend it to fans of the "Phantasm" series. And on that note, I should probably give out my final thoughts on the "Phantasm" series as a whole package. Well...it's certainly a really interesting series of movies. Especially ones where they didn't go down the route of churning out a sequel almost every year just to make a quick buck. That said, however, all of these movies, even the first one, didn't entirely 'wow' me. And because of that, I'm probably never going to be watching these particular movies again unless I had some morbid curiosity for some reason. So yeah, I did enjoy watching these movies once, but sadly, I just don't see myself ever watching them again, unless, you know, morbid curiosity and everything. But if you enjoyed them more than I did, then that's awesome. More power to you if loved these movies. I myself, unfortunately, didn't. But I would've never known for myself what these movies were like until I covered them for this series. So, I can at least say that they were worth the time for me.

And with that, guys, we come to the close of another Reaction & Review. Until next time, ladies and gentlemen, take care, and I will see you all later. Peace.

Reaction & Review | I Spit On Your Grave

Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to an all new Reaction & Review. Tonight, guys, I'm gonna be covering an exploitation film from 1978. That movie is "I Spit On Your Grave".

Now, if you're not familiar with this movie, it's considered by many people to be one of the most famous exploitation films to ever exist, for better or for worse. I say this, because this movie's plot is centered around something pretty damn heavy. So, I'm not gonna sugarcoat anything when I tell you that the plot to this thing is essentially about a woman, who gets horribly raped and tortured by a group of savage men, and she sets out for revenge against her rapists who left her for dead.

I'm gonna tell you, guys, the reason why I wanted to watch this was simply because of it's premise alone. I really have a soft spot for revenge films. Granted, I understand that my track record with revenge movies for this series hasn't exactly been stellar, however, I still have hopes of this thing being great. But the only way I'm gonna find out if this thing is any good at all, is if I shut up and I push play, and I'm gonna do that right now. So, without further ado, it's time to kick back, relax, and check out "I Spit On Your Grave".

14 minutes later

You know, guys, what I find rather eerie about this movie so far? It's the fact that there's no music playing in this movie. OK sure, we had one of the guys playing a little bit of the harmonica, but aside from that, there's nothing resembling a score for this movie at all, so far. And I find that it's going to make that particular moment of the movie all the more chilling once we get to it. I've got a feeling about that.

19 minutes later

Guys, I've heard from people who have seen this movie that it's a very hard watch to get through. And from what I'm seeing myself right now, yeah...they weren't kidding about that. This is very hard to watch. And yet, despite that, I *can't* take my eyes away from it. That's how powerful this movie is!

20 minutes later

You know, guys, I would feel relieved by the fact that Matthew spared her life the way he did. But to be perfectly honest with you, guys, any sympathy I may have had for him, prior to that, is completely gone by the moment that he took part in the rape. And I'm not gonna be satisfied until he's fucking dead.

7 minutes later

OK, I have a legitimate question here. So, now these guys are talking about how it's been 2 weeks since these guys raped and "killed" Jennifer. And I want to emphasize that point, because they're at some sort of restaurant talking about all this, while other people are around as well! Don't you think that if anyone of them overheard them talking about this, that they would report them to the police? I don't know, it's just something that I was sorta thinking about, you know?

16 minutes later

Well, that's certainly a way to take him out. Not totally sure brutally hanging him would be my first choice, but you know what? It's still totally effective, so I'll take what I can get.

13 minutes later

You know, guys, I was gonna question why Jennifer was taking the methodical route on killing this guy. But you know what? It was *totally* worth it in the end. That one was fucking satisfying!

The Review

Well, guys, that was "I Spit On Your Grave". Let me go ahead and shut the movie off here...OK. Holy shit, what a movie...it's not often I ever get to say that, but it was definitely worth seeing after all this time.

Let me start off by saying that, going into this thing, I knew what to expect from it. Not just from what I've heard about it, but from seeing a trailer of this thing from way back when. For me, personally, this was the kind of movie that I was going to like. Because, like I said earlier, I have a soft spot for revenge movies, and I've never had a chance to see this one before until now. And I've heard a lot of things about it, both positive and negatively. Things such as how it's one of the most controversial films to be ever made for it's time, or how it supposedly "glorifies" rape. Which, if you read up on why the director of this movie, Meir Zarchi, wanted to make this movie, that's not the case at all. And quite frankly, if Zarchi had chickened out and made it differently than how he originally wanted to make it, then it would've completely destroyed this movie entirely. Now, I get that this is not going to be everyone's cup of tea, I can assure you on that. However, I am happy that Zarchi got to make the movie in his own vision, and I can safely say that the final product most definitely delivers. At least, to me it does.

Anyway, let's get into the writing here. Now admittedly, there really isn't a whole lot of writing here, other than what I've already touched upon to you guys. So instead, I actually want to touch upon the characters in this movie. And I want start off with our main character, Jennifer Hills. Now admittedly, she does start off kinda sorta bland at first, as she's just trying to write her first novel at a summer home she's staying at. But after she goes through the whole rape ordeal by her attackers, she gets emotionally destroyed, to which she later gets her revenge on her rapists. And the whole thing makes her feel almost...numb afterwards. Which is a scary thought, but it's rather understandable. Because she was raped at least 3 or 4 times throughout the whole movie. I couldn't even begin to imagine the kind of pain that she went through. And it makes you care about her, because you *want* to see her getting revenge on the ruthless savages that had their way with her.

Speaking of which, I want touch upon one of the rapists in this movie, which would be Matthew. See, Matthew in this movie is kinda the nerd of the group. He reveals later on to the other would-be rapists that he has never been laid before and how he made friends with Jennifer, who just moved into her summer home. And I believe it's from this motivation in which these guys start their little raping crusade on Jennifer, because they did it for him, and that they want to see him lose his virginity by raping our leading lady. Now the first time that they do this, Matthew actually develops something of a conscious and let's her go. Yes, he was partially responsible for holding her down on a couple of occasions while she was being raped, but I think he genuinely felt really bad about it and didn't want to go any further on it.

But it was at the moment that Jennifer made it back to her summer home in which her rapists were lying in wait for her that began to change Matthew. And mind you, at this point, Jennifer is completely drained both physically and mentally. Which is where they finally give Matthew the encouragement that he needed to go through with the horrible act. Which he does, however, in very slight defense of him, he doesn't goes entirely all the way, like how the other two rapists did earlier on. That said, I still hold that after that moment that he puts his body on top of her, any ounce of sympathy that I may have had for him completely disappeared after that. Because *he* took part in it, he went through it, and is ultimately no better than the rest of his psychopathic friends. Now granted, he doesn't actually kill her, like his friends told him to do so, but still, my point about him still stands.

Now admittedly, this movie does have a couple of problems, the controversial rape scenes not counting. One of those problems I'll get into a little later on, but one of the problems that this movie kinda suffers from is it's pacing. I say "kinda", because the pacing is a little bit uneven at times. Because the first hour of the movie, it sets up our main character, our rapists, and the setting, along with the controversial rape scenes. All of that takes place within the first hour of the movie. The latter 40 minutes or so is essentially Jennifer slowly getting her revenge on her captors. And the reason why she does it slowly is because her method of killing them is more on the methodical side of things rather than going for the quick kill. Which, admittedly, could be seen as more of a potential lapse in logic. But you have to understand that it had only been 2 weeks since the horrible incident that took place, and she's still at her summer home. So I imagined that she had been taking her time on how deal her revenge against her rapists, while also trying recuperate on dealing with her emotional pain and suffering.

That said, I do like how this movie took it's time, rather than quickly rushing into things and getting her revenge over and done with. Though admittedly, the ending is a little anti-climatic, but other than that, the rest of the pacing is rather good, too. Other than that, guys, the writing here is great. It really sucks you in it's story from the moment it kicks off. Even during the very raw moments of the film, whether it's the rape scenes themselves or the revenge bit in the latter half of the movie, it still keeps your interest and doesn't let up on it. Now I understand that this kind of movie is not going to be for everyone, however, I'll get into all that later when I get to recommendations. But I will summarize my thoughts here by stating, again, that the writing here is great.

Acting here is kind of a mixed bag though. Our actors playing the rapists kinda ham it a little bit, with the guy playing Matthew, who definitely sounds rather goofy with his performance, being the most hammy of the bunch. It's not great, but at least it is decent enough for what they had to work with. The best actress, by far though, would have to go to Camille Keaton as our main star. She nails this performance down perfectly. Even during the horrible rape scenes, she still gives out a 110% here. She makes it sound very believable and it makes her performance stand out in an incredible way. She was perfect for this role, and I commend her the most for taking on such a role like this. The rest of the acting is kinda weak, but it's still serviceable enough to make the film work in their favor.

Special effects in this movie are actually pretty good. Now mind you, this film was made on a ridiculously low budget. It was only made for $80,000, but they still made that budget work for the most part. The makeup effects here are decent, the blood and gore effects are pretty good, as well. It's not great, and I've seen better practical effects done in other low budget films, but I'd still say that they were pretty good, overall.

Our camerawork here is really good for low budget standards. The lighting is pretty good here, too. The sound-mix, though, is admittedly one of the only other issues that this movie kinda suffers from. And I'm mainly talking about a few scenes here and there in which some of the acting sounds kinda muffled. It's hard to hear what they are saying at times, and it also kinda hurts some scenes that are shot outdoors, because the background noise will come into effect by drowning out some of the actor's dialogue. It probably would've helped some things if they had gotten a boom mic to help pick up what the actors were saying in those bits. Again, I understand this thing was made on a low budget, but I'm pretty sure, even by late 1970's standards, that boom mics probably didn't cost that much to get. Now admittedly, I don't have the figures for it, so you'll just have to take what I said about that with a grain of salt. Still though, my criticisms still stand on this issue.

Last thing I want to cover is the music. Well, more specifically, the lack of music. Because this movie is one of those rare instances where it does not have any kind of music, both in score and soundtrack. Now again, there is some bits of music here, such as where one of our rapists is playing a harmonica or there is someone playing an organ at a church, but there is no overall score here. Which actually helps this movie, because, as I've made mention before, the lack of music is what sometimes helps enhance a movie's atmosphere. And this movie is definitely no exception. Throughout the first half hour of the movie, I couldn't help but feel that there is something here that felt rather eerie about it. And my hunch was right, because it eventually led up to the rape scenes. And it makes the film's atmosphere that much more eerie and suspenseful, because if they had any kind of music playing during those rape scenes, I feel like it would've destroyed the movie's atmosphere. Which makes me dread on how exactly the remake from 2010 handled it. I'm probably never going to watch it simply because of the possibility that they'll never do this movie justice. So, setting aside that topic, the lack of music here is fantastic, in which they don't really utilize any score at all here.

Ultimately, guys, when everything is said and done, am I able to recommend "I Spit On Your Grave"? Yes, I definitely can. But, I obviously have to put in a warning here that you have to go into it knowing what to expect. This movie is definitely *not* for the faint of heart. So if you have a weakness to this sort of subject being played out, then you're obviously not gonna want to watch this thing. This movie is very raw with it's subject and is not gonna shy away from it at all. And if you're someone who is strong enough to handle this kind of subject, then you're most likely gonna enjoy this movie. As for myself, I really enjoyed this thing immensely. Yes, it's a very uncomfortable film, but like I said, it knows what it wants to be, and I knew what to expect going into it. As a revenge movie, it's probably one of the best ones I've ever seen. Granted, that may not be saying a whole lot, given the track record it has going for this series, but it's still a great movie, and I will probably watch it again at some point. For now though, I'm gonna go watch something else, maybe something a little bit more light-hearted after watching this thing. I don't know, maybe I'll watch something like "Kiki's Delivery Service". It's been a little while since I last saw it, so I'm gonna go do that next after I get done typing this review up.

And with that, guys, we come to the close of another Reaction & Review. Until next time, ladies and gentlemen, take care, and I will see you all later. Peace.

Reaction & Review | Phantasm IV: Oblivion

Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to an all new Reaction & Review. Tonight, guys, we're continuing the "Phantasm" series by taking a look at the fourth entry that came out in 1998. That movie is "Phantasm IV: Oblivion".

Now, if I had to summarize my overall thoughts on the "Phantasm" series up till this point, I would say that they have been really interesting. Mind you, when I say that, I am not saying that they're great movies or anything, but I still do enjoy them and I still want to see where they go with this series.

That said, though, I do need to confess something. I've noticed that with each movie that we've gone through, the quality of the writing in these movie has been slowly declining. Now again, I am not saying that these movies have been bad or anything, in fact, I was still able to recommend the two prior movies if you enjoyed the first one. It's just that I've been noticing more and more issues when it comes to the writing in these particular movies, and I fear that I may find more issues here once I start watching this fourth movie.

Now I'm hoping that I'm wrong here. I would love for this 4th movie to exceed my expectations and be amazing. However, I also have to keep in mind that when it comes to sequels, preferably horror movie sequels, they usually start to really go down in quality by the 4th entry. A great example would be the 4th "Wishmaster" movie, AKA "Wishmaster: The Prophecy Fulfilled". That film was so bad that it pretty much killed that entire franchise. Thankfully, at least with the "Phantasm" series, it did get a 5th movie, however, I'll get more into that after I get through this one first.

So with all this in mind, I'm hoping for this one to be really good. And the only way I am gonna find out if this thing is any good at all, is if I shut up and I push play, and I'm gonna do that right now. So, without further ado, it's time to kick back, relax, and check out "Phantasm IV: Oblivion".

13 minutes later

OK, I have a question about something. So, Reggie is now on his own while Jody is now telling him that he should continue looking for Mike. That's fine and everything, but what exactly happened to Tim? The kid that was with Reggie in the previous movie. Did he actually end up getting killed by the Tall Man or something? Based on the ending of the previous movie, it *seems* like that might be the case, but it's still very vague, given that all of these movies have had these cliffhanger endings where the characters still lived in the sequels. I'm hoping that it gets explained at some point, but it just seems kinda messed up to leave Tim's status the way it is now, you know what I mean?

8 minutes later

OK well, that was kinda messed up. I've never seen one of these reanimated corpses spill out their yellow blood into Reggie's mouth like that. I'm not even sure if I should even call it blood at this point, but still, it was definitely messed up. And I definitely would not want someone's yellow blood being splurged into my mouth like that.

13 minutes later

All right, I have a big question here, and it's something I've been wondering about for a while now. So, up until this point, we've been seeing scenes of Mike as a young boy again. And it seems like this is the same actor that was in the first movie. So my question is that are all these scenes that we've been seeing are all deleted scenes from the first movie? I'm asking this, because I genuinely don't believe that they hired new actors to play Mike, Jody, or even the Tall Man for these particular scenes. I genuinely believe that they were just using scenes that didn't make the cut from the first movie and tried to implement them in this movie somehow. So it makes me curious as to how many scenes there were that they filmed, but originally never made the cut? I'm really curious about that now.

20 minutes later

So, guys, I was hoping I wouldn't have to ask this, especially now that we're on the 4th entry of this series, but is anything interesting gonna happen in this movie? Because, I'm gonna tell you, guys, right now, the pacing in this movie has become rather glacial. And it's sad for me to ask this because the previous "Phantasm" movies, for all the flaws that they've had, still made me interested to see where they were gonna go. But this one is not really doing it for me for some reason. I'm hoping the next half hour or so will get more interesting, but as of right now, the pacing in this movie is slowly starting to kill it for me.

6 minutes later

Well...that's certainly creative-looking. I didn't think I'd get to see metal sphere boobs on a woman in a "Phantasm" movie, but I did. And...well, again, it's certainly creative. I'll say that much.

The Review

Well, guys, that was "Phantasm IV: Oblivion". Let me go ahead shut the movie off here...OK. Hmm...well, I called it. I said earlier that I kept finding more problems with the writing in these "Phantasm" movies, and I feared that I would find more of those problems if I watched this movie. And yeah, I did. I was hoping not to, but just based on what I watched, I can easily say that this is, by far, the weakest entry in the entire "Phantasm" series. Gosh, this was just massively disappointing.

Let's just get into this by talking about the movie itself. I'm gonna start with writing. And I want to start off by confirming something I had asked earlier, in which if this movie was actually using deleted footage that never made it in the first movie. And that is actually true. Now admittedly, I don't know how much old footage was used in this movie, because I wasn't able to find any information on that. But regardless, they were able to use it in a way to fill in gaps and to also correlate with how the movie is being written here. And I will say that it does kinda work, to a degree. However, the problem is that it feels like it almost overtakes about half of the entire movie. And what we have here that isn't old unused footage feels like it really doesn't go much of anywhere. I'll get more into this in a second, but to me, it just feels like the movie doesn't really feel like a direct sequel. It just feels more like an in-between prequel/sequel movie that mostly just tries to fill in gaps that may feel somewhat unnecessary. Again, I do like how they were able to use unused footage that never made it into the first movie, but I feel like it doesn't really advance much of the actual story that we got here.

Speaking of which, let's talk about the actual story we got here for this movie. Now, setting aside unused footage and everything, the story here really is kind of a rehash of what was pulled off in the previous movie. Once again, Mike is on his own, as he tries to outwit the Tall Man in order to not become one of his victims. And to do this, he actually is able to travel through these dimension poles in Death Valley, and is able to travel back in time to the past to where he comes across the Tall Man before he became evil. And he actually had a name too, in which he was called Jebediah Morningside. In which it's here, we're finally able to get more of a backstory on the guy himself. Which is admittedly cool to see, however, I feel like, being that we're on the fourth entry now, it just feels like a situation of too little too late. I would have love to seen more of this within the first or second movie. Though to be fair, they did kinda scratched the surface of that in the first movie. But to have it here now, at this juncture of the franchise, seems like a bit of desperation to me. Now mind you, the backstory for the Tall Man is perfectly fine and all. It just feels like, to me anyway, that they could've pulled this off a bit more sooner is what I'm trying to get at.

Now since I just finished talking about the Tall Man's backstory, let's actually get more into the characters. Mike really hasn't changed all that much, apart from acting somewhat monotone throughout the movie. Although to be fair, I can kinda understand his position, seeing as how long he's been being chased and all. And as for Reggie, well, his character honestly feels like it serves no purpose in this movie whatsoever. And I'm not kidding about that either, guys, because they are rehashing the same kind of shit they did in the second movie with him, in which it's basically just another road trip featuring mainly him. Well, he does end up meeting a woman named Jennifer here, but she really plays almost no part in this movie. And I feel like if you cut her out of the movie entirely, you wouldn't be missing a thing with her around. But aside from her, Reggie, like I said, just does the same kind of shit here. And it's to a point where I feel like Don Coscarelli, who also wrote this movie, has no idea on what to do with Reggie at all. I feel like he's only here because he's Mike's friend and guardian. But aside from that, any advancements on his character is completely non-existent here.

And that brings me to one of the biggest problems with this movie as a whole, which would be the film's pacing. This thing feels incredibly slow. In fact, I'd say it's much slower here than the how second movie was. At least there, when that movie picked up, it picked up pretty quickly and got interesting again. Here though, there's very few bits of interest that happen in this movie, to which it ends up becoming boring. I'd never thought I'd say that about a "Phantasm" film, but this thing almost felt fucking boring to watch! And mind you, the movie's only about 90 minutes long, but it honestly felt it went on for almost 2 hours long instead. And it brings me back to the unused footage, because I feel like, when this movie was being made, they didn't have enough original footage to fill in the necessary material to make it a feature length film, so they had to fill in enough of what wasn't used in the first movie and insert here so that they could get enough material in order to make the film feel feature length. Now mind you, this is just me theorizing here, so I could be totally wrong about that part. But that's what it felt like to me when watching this movie, it just felt longer than it should of been.

So yeah, guys, the writing here has definitely gone down in quality. Now that being said, I hesitate to call this a "bad" movie, it's just not all that impressive with it's lackluster writing. That being said, though, I can say that the acting is still rather good for the most part. Everybody here worked with what they could work with. Mind you now, the acting isn't great, aside from Reggie Bannister and Angus Scrimm still putting on great performances. But still though, I wouldn't say that the acting from the rest of the cast was awful or anything, it was just decent for most part.

Special effects are also pretty good, too. This is one thing I can definitely say about the special effects is that, barring the first film, they've always stayed consistent with each movie and I'm glad to see that same amount of consistency here. There is one bit of usage for CG in this movie, and that is at the very beginning of the movie where you get to see a bunch of metal spheres flying in one large group together. It's pretty good stuff, even by the standards of 1998. The practical effects are also good, too. Sadly, there isn't any killing involving a metal sphere here, which is actually really disappointing when you really think about it, but the effects involving them still look good. So I can at least say that much.

Camerawork here is pretty good. The lighting is lit very well. The sound-mix here is perfectly fine. And the score here is also decent, too. It's nothing special, but still very atmospheric when it wants to be.

Ultimately, guys, when all is said and done, am I able to recommend "Phantasm IV: Oblivion"? Um...well, if you've followed the previous 3 movies, and you enjoyed them, then you'll probably find something to like here as well. However, I personally wasn't able to find much enjoyment out of this 4th installment. I really wanted to be proven wrong and hope that this movie was gonna be amazing. But sometimes, you can be totally right on your first assumption. This movie's quality in writing definitely declined, and I personally don't see myself ever watching this one again. It's just ultimately forgetful, and very disappointing, too. And I have no idea what the fuck they're gonna do for the fifth movie, especially considering the year it came out in. However, I'll get to all that when I eventually cover it in a couple of weeks. For now, though, I'm gonna go do something better. Perhaps I'll just go and watch something like "Wicked City". Why not? I haven't seen that in over a year and a half, so I'm gonna go do that next once I get done typing this review up.

Anyways, guys, with that, we come to the close of another Reaction & Review. Until next time, ladies and gentlemen, take care, and I will see you all later. Peace.

Reaction & Review | Simon Sez

Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to an all new Reaction & Review. Tonight, guys, I'm gonna be checking out an action flick from 1999. That movie is "Simon Sez".

No, guys, you are not mis-seeing things, this is an action film starring Dennis Rodman. I'll get more into him in a second. But first things first, that title sounds *incredibly* stupid. I don't know if it's meant to mean something, or if it's just some idiotic attempt to pluralize the letter Z to make it sound "edgy" and "cool". And if it's the latter, then it fails miserably at it.

Now, skipping past the stupid title, let's get back into talking about our film's star here. I don't really know anything about the movie, plot wise, other than the fact that it stars Mr. Rodman here. And the only other film I can recall ever seeing him in was when he teamed up with Jean-Claude Van Damme in "Double Team". And for the record, "Double Team" really kinda sucked. So you'll forgive me if I'm going into this one with very low standards, considering Rodman is flying solo here.

I have no idea if this thing is going to be any good at all. I have strong doubts that it's probably not going to be, but maybe, just maybe, Dennis Rodman could actually surprise me here somehow. Again, my doubts on that are incredibly low here, but there *is* that slight chance that it could be sorta interesting. Really though, the only way I'm gonna find out if this movie is interesting at all, is if I shut up and I push play, and I'm gonna do that right now. So, without further ado, it's time to kick back, relax, and check out "Simon Sez".

10 minutes later

Guys, I'm just gonna state this right now. Even though these two dipshit buddies of Simon have barely been on screen for about a few minutes now, I'm already beginning to get annoyed by them real quick. I'm hoping maybe that we'll get to see less of them as the movie goes on. But right now, these two idiots have already left a negative impression on me.

7 minutes later

So, guys, I may just have to rescind my statement from earlier, because I have just found the most annoying character in this entire movie. Nick Miranda. This guy is becoming aggravating with each passing minute that he's been on screen, and it's becoming very tiresome, very quick. And the more that this guy gets screen time, the more that I just want him to fucking die! I have a sneaking suspicion that he won't die, but god damn it, I gotta have a little bit of faith here in the hopes that it does happen.

19 minutes later

OK, I have a legitimate question here. So, Simon's car has the ability to lean right, meaning that it'll just drive on the right two wheels of it's side. Now I normally wouldn't care about this, seeing as it's just an action film, but is it normal for a car to lean like that while driving? I could maybe understand if it did that for like, a few seconds or so before falling back on all fours, but it's *still* going at only two wheels! You would think that the damn thing would've just tipped over by now, but no, it's still somehow able to keep going like that. Well, *was*, but now it's finally back on all fours. Still though, you can only suspend your disbelief for so long before you start question it's intelligence.

10 minutes later

So, guys, we're now being treated to...I guess, it's suppose to be a mixture of a sex scene and a soft-core porno flick between Simon and this chick. I can't really tell what it's suppose to be, because the lights are flickering and the music is shit on top of it. Granted, the woman that Simon is supposedly banging is sexy as hell. But sadly, I don't really give a fuck about this scene, so...go figure, I guess.

18 minutes later

You know, guys, it's kinda funny that the only character in this movie that I sorta like is our villain, Ashton. Why? Because he acts a little bit cartoonishly, but not to the point where he becomes ridiculously annoying. Unlike our supporting characters, who are all ridiculously annoying. That is kinda sad to admit when the only character that is even likable at all is the one villain who you're not suppose to be rooting for. That's just classy, guys.

The Review

Well, guys, that was "Simon Sez". Thank god it's over. Let me this garbage movie off here...OK. Christ almighty, that was terrible...well, where the hell do I even start here? I knew, going into this movie, that it was gonna suck. Except I didn't think it was going to suck this badly. Sure, I had low expectations from the start, but this movie didn't even meet those standards! That's how bad it really is.

Let's just go ahead and get right into this thing. Let's start off with the writing. And I'm not gonna spend too much time on the writing here, because well, it's an action film, and most people don't really care about that kind of thing when it comes to this genre of film. Which is funny, because the story here is incredibly bare bones. Essentially, our main character, Simon, is an Interpol agent who gets tasked with rescuing a girl from an arms dealer named Ashton, who, in exchange, wants a disc that contains secrets to a weapon that'll be used to destroy shit. And joining him on this little adventure is his painfully annoying partner, Nick, who I'll talk more about in a moment. His two, almost equally, annoying friends who assist mostly as his tech support, his hot ex-girlfriend who's accent I can't determine if it's either French or Russian, and the kidnapped girl's boyfriend, whose name I don't fucking remember because he is just that forgettable. So yeah, story wise, this movie is doing nothing new or different, and it's something we've seen done many times beforehand in plenty of other action movies.

I may as well just stop side-stepping the issue here and start talking about the characters. Now, there are 3 types of personalities you're gonna find in this movie. You are either gonna be painfully annoying, such as Simon's two friends or Nick. You are gonna be personality free and boring as shit, such as the case with Simon himself. Or you're just gonna be fucking forgettable, such as the case with the boyfriend of the kidnapped girl or Simon's ex-girlfriend. All of these characters don't have any depth or range of likability to them whatsoever. The worst of this has to go Nick Miranda. The best way I can summarize this character is if you had that one friend who *really* wants to hang out with you, wants to have a good time, and is suppose to be the life of the party. But in actuality, that friend is just being ridiculously annoying and that you just want to spend some time by yourself. That is honestly the nicest way I can describe Dane Cook's character in this movie. He essentially likes to chew up the scenery when he's on screen, but he does it in a way where it's not charming in the slightest. That is how much his character in this movie sucks.

And again, the only character who actually seemed somewhat likable was our main villain, Ashton. Like I said before, he ranges on being a bit cartoony, but at the very least, he has something resembling charm to his character. Mind you, his character in this movie is not really good either, but he doesn't tread the path on becoming painfully annoying, unlike Nick, who just doesn't know when to shut the fuck up at times. While I'm kinda on the subject here, the movie also tries to be a comedy. And I'm gonna tell you right now that the comedy in this thing fails miserably because none of this shit is funny at all. I didn't laugh when Dane Cook was making those stupid-looking faces the first time he goes against Simon's ex-girlfriend, nor did I get a laugh out of Simon's two idiotic friends. Nothing about the humor here works. Most of it comes from Dane Cook's character, Nick, but like I said, all of it is unfunny, especially coming from him. I don't care if his character is suppose to be inept, it still made me despise him every time he showed up on screen. Which, unsurprisingly, makes him the worst character of this entire movie.

Now since I've been mostly focusing on the characters here, let's actually talk about the acting next. Most of the acting here sucks. The worst actor by far, would have to be our main star Dennis Rodman. Which really shouldn't come as a shock to nobody, considering Rodman's "illustrious filmography" and all, but the reason why he's the worst one here is mainly because his acting borders on being wooden and he honestly sounds really fucking bored, too. Which, I'm not totally sure if that's how he naturally sounds when attempting to act, but regardless, he easily phones in the worst performance. Second place would have to go Dane Cook's character, Nick, for all of the reasons that I explained already. Nobody here really tried very much. But then again, there is only so much you can do when given a script that is this fucking poor to begin with.

Special effects in this movie suck balls. But before I comment on why, I will grant the movie two things. The fight choreography was halfway decent, and the squib work on the guns were OK, too. That's it. Those are the *only* two positives I can grant this movie as a whole. But getting back to the shitty special effects, I was originally not gonna comment on this one very much, because the only things that I happened to notice were a mechanical CG fly and bee that were used to serve as spy cameras made by Simon's two friends. And if it were just those two instances, then I would've said that the CG on them isn't all that amazing, even by the standards 1999. But that's when we get towards the very end of the movie, in which Simon is escaping from a building, and the building explodes. And what comes afterwards is when we get to see the fire effects as Simon is walking away from the burning building. To put it simply, guys, the fire effects during that scene are *horrible*! Like, this is genuinely some of the worst-looking CG fire I have ever seen in any movie in a long time. I don't care if this was made on a low budget, there is no excuse to have CG fire that looks this fucking bad! So much so that, that one scene made me push the special effects into becoming shit as a whole.

Let's talk about editing next. Oh yes, guys, the editing in this movie is horrible. The best example of how bad the editing is in this movie is during a scene in the third act, where one of Simon's friends, who was also the fat Caucasian monk, trembles over a bridge after a fight scene and is holding on for dear life. Simon goes over to rescue him after getting involved in a shootout with Ashton's men, and it's here where we get to see the failures of the editing come into play. So as Simon is running over towards him, you get to see a wider shot of the fat guy holding onto the bridge railing. And as this shot happens, you get to notice the size difference of the actor that's suppose to be holding onto the railing, because it shows the guy looking incredibly skinny. And again, I would like to remind you guys that the actor is fat. So, when you show a skinny-looking guy trying to disguise himself as a fat guy, it kinda makes you question why exactly didn't they hire a stunt double to try and match the size of how the fat one looked? I understand that it would be kinda difficult for someone who is obviously overweight to try and hold onto a bridge railing for so long, but you could've possibly filmed it in a way to where the overweight actor doesn't have anything to fear from falling. So for them to just say "fuck it" and hire an obviously skinny stunt double to, in no way, look like the same overweight actor, just comes off as incredibly lazy on the filmmakers part.

Camerawork here is OK for what it is. The lighting here is mostly fine, save for that one scene I mentioned earlier where Simon and his ex-girlfriend were banging each other. Sound-mix here is mixed fine, and the music here is shit. At times, it tries to go for techno music, and the techno music here sucks. But then again, techno music isn't really that good anyways, so it's whatever really. The rest of the music that isn't techno is incredibly forgetful, too. So really, you're not missing here when it comes to this movie's music.

So overall, guys, when everything is said and done, am I able to recommend "Simon Sez"? No. Fuck no. This movie is garbage on just about every conceivable level. There is nothing about this thing that I could consider worth watching, unless if you're someone who really likes these kind of shitty action movies with little to no plot whatsoever. And if that *is* your thing, then you might something here that you'll really like. But as for myself, well...no. I am never gonna be watching this stupid thing ever again. Because, one, I like to have most of my action movies have something resembling substance. And secondly, I'm hoping and praying that I *never* have to watch another movie starring Dennis Rodman in anything else. This movie proved, to me, that the man cannot act, if just by the viewings of both this and "Double Team" are anything to go by. So yeah, guys, I'm done talking about this movie. Right now, I just want to go watch something different. Perhaps maybe I'll watch the 1993 "Judge Dredd" movie starring Sylvester Stallone. While that is kinda stupid as well, at least there's something resembling substance in that thing. So that's what I'm gonna go do next after I get done typing this review up.

Anyway, guys, with that we come to the close of another Reaction & Review. Until next time, ladies and gentlemen, take care, and I will see you all later. Peace.